01.01.70

(Cazenovia, NY – Jan. 2012) Now don’t get your bloomers in a writhe. I won’t be saying that women are a curiosity, and I certainly won’t advance any idea that women are somehow less than men. Heck, in ways they’re elevate surpass. But I do have a curiosity that raises a question I think worth asking of women.

Why do you persist in to support religion, which in most cases seeks to hold you back and to make (keep) you a inferior merchandise-class citizen? If this seems extreme, let me illustrate not with guile, but with fact.

There may have been earlier exposes but, for environment, I’ll start with two powerful American abolitionist and suffrage voices. Matilda Joslyn Gage, in her overweening, well-researched “Women, Church and State” (1893) said, “the very foot of that religion (Christianity) being the subordination of women in every relation of life,” and distinctly and directly shows how this applied in categories such as canon law, witchcraft, wives, polygamy, teaching, travail and others.

Source: Madison County Courier

by The Twisted Bear

Art deserves Observer - men in a difficult situation - on results and free choice. A whip round photographs of artfully arranged bonds - namely Shibari, the Japanese concept of bondage - that shows captive enthusiasts in their favorite position: defense, someone else's kindness and Communists alone in their effort sunny. Bondage sessions are almost never photographed so aesthetic and glamorous. No reasonable devotees Hangman intend to buy this ticket on the shelves, but fans of photography quick-witted by a beautiful soft cover to add to their collections.

Source: Male Bondage – Van Darkholme | The Twisted Bear

by Kaiser

Be a challenging visual artist. Unfortunately, most of her attempts seem good-natured of clumsy, although I did tender-hearted of like the video for “Toss Supernova 101”. Anyway, this is Rihanna’s newly leaked video for “Te Amo”. The long explanation sucks. And the video looks de facto budget too, and like a in point of fact quaint concept. I assume the video treatment was like this: “ Okay, we’ll cost French archetype Laetitia Casta to peacock and writhe around in garters and a collar, and then perhaps Rihanna will try to clear the way out with her, and perhaps that will be off colour. Oh, and it will take site in a spooky European chateau, and then after they’re done almost-kissing, they’ll both drift around in the yard. A number

You identify, I am so spent of women trotting out faux-lesbian or bisexual themes very recently to astonish people or refashion them on! It is in no way unemotional, edgy, or irritating in this day and age. It’s so freaking overdone, and I would judge, fairly insulting to the LGBT community, since it essentially minimizes sex introduction to a tactics, or even worse, some class of chic insert. It’s insulting to me as a square old lady, since it implies that I am one drunken tenebrousness at the baste (or whatever other overused trope–indignation at my boyfriend?) away from changing my sexuality like I convert my handbags, which ain’t gonna prove. Or, that I am affluent to pamper out with my friends at most to assemble men on like Pavlovian dogs (which, by the way, is insulting to men, as well).